Every SOW already describes its supplier shortlist. We extract it — with evidence.
SpiderNet converts an uploaded Statement of Work into structured, source-cited requirements, matches them against a supplier database enriched with real tender history, and produces an explainable shortlist where every claim is backed by evidence. Minutes and hours instead of days and weeks.
Two categories. Your real SOWs. A three-month pilot to a verdict.
Both sides of sourcing operate on incomplete information
Supplier databases are large but full of stale, self-reported data. Qualification is still done by hand — in Excel and in the memory of individual buyers.
Procurement teams
Have the database — not a reliable answer.
- ✕Supplier data is fragmented, outdated and mostly self-reported.
- ✕Technical qualification is manual every time, and the same suppliers get re-researched again and again.
- ✕Supplier selection depends on individual buyers’ memory and legacy relationships.
Qualified suppliers
Have the capacity and the certificates — no way to be seen.
- ✕Invisible outside the tenders they happen to enter.
- ✕Rebuild the same qualification paperwork for every single buyer.
- ✕No way to prove capability to a buyer who has never met them.
Buyers cannot verify; suppliers cannot be discovered.
The live supplier directory is the product surface buyers return to
SpiderNet first makes the market visible: approved, known and newly discovered suppliers are assembled into one evidence-backed directory. A profile is not just a name — it carries contacts, capabilities, experience, certificates and source confidence.
The shortlist comes from the directory; the directory improves with every SOW and every source check.
Browse the directoryLegal name, tax ID, branch, brand and trading name are separated so the same supplier does not appear three times.
The minimum useful record is company, category, phone or email, source URL and last verified date.
Tender results, accreditation records, company websites, directories and manufacturer lists are stored with separate confidence.
Turn a short brief into a scope of work
Describe an HVAC maintenance need in a few lines. The builder asks only for what is missing, shows you the open items it could not resolve, and hands back a scope and a requirements file you can download.
Open the scope builderHVAC maintenance today. Runs in your browser, the draft stays in this tab, and you can work through it without AI if you prefer.
- 1
Describe the need in your own words
- 2
Answer only the gaps the AI finds
- 3
Download the scope and the requirements
The market is already in the directory
Every profile is assembled from public sources, and every claim is tied to one. The examples below are examples, not recommendations.
The shortlist is already written inside the SOW
Every SOW effectively describes who qualifies: technical requirements, experience, certificates, financial thresholds. We don’t guess any of it — we extract it from the document, with citations.
110 kV substation reconstruction
78 pages · mixed AZ/EN · scanned tables included
We don’t guess requirements — we extract them, with citations.
Not another supplier directory — an SOW-to-shortlist matching product
The enriched supplier database is the substrate. Three outputs are what the customer actually buys.
Structured requirements
Requirements extracted from the SOW with section and page citations and mandatory/optional status. No mandatory criterion excludes anyone until you confirm it.
Evidence-backed shortlist
10–20 candidates drawn from approved, known and newly discovered suppliers — with proof, gaps and contradictions listed per requirement.
Explainable recommendation
Not one opaque percentage: requirement-by-requirement status, evidence sources, risk flags and missing information — in an audit-ready form.
The database is the substrate. The evidence-backed match is the product.
AI does the research; you make the decision
Human control is preserved at every step: no supplier is excluded by a criterion you didn’t confirm, and no recommendation ships without a source.
Upload the SOW
PDF, DOCX or scan — in Azerbaijani, Russian or English, mixed-language documents included.
Extracts requirements with citations
Every requirement is tied to its source section and page, with type, importance and extraction confidence.
Confirm the mandatory criteria
Only a human-confirmed requirement can become an exclusion rule.
Discovers, enriches, qualifies
Search across three pools — approved, known and new suppliers; deep research is spent only on the strongest candidates.
Approve the shortlist
Inspect the evidence, add or remove candidates, and hand the approved list to your sourcing event.
The AI never decides on its own — it makes your decision faster.
Similarity is not qualification
Semantic similarity is only the beginning. Every recommendation must clear hard qualification gates first — and commercial promotion never touches the ranking.
Every recommendation clears these gates
- ✓Human-confirmed mandatory criteria
- ✓Certificates, licenses and their validity
- ✓Sanctions and compliance screening
- ✓Capability fit on the taxonomy
- ✓Semantic match on real project experience
- ✓Financial and capacity thresholds
- ✓Geography and delivery requirements
- ✓Configurable, evidence-weighted scoring
Qualification first. Similarity second. Payment never.
Every attribute carries provenance
The status of every fact is shown openly: verified, supplier-declared, externally observed or AI-inferred. An AI inference is never dressed up as a verified fact.
Deep research only where it pays off
Instead of continuously enriching an entire database, research deepens stage by stage against live demand. The result: speed, low cost and data that is always fresh.
Broad discovery
~100 candidates across three pools: approved, known and new suppliers.
Low-cost enrichment
Registries, sanctions and internal history narrow the list to ~30.
Deep enrichment
Websites, documents and references — for the strongest candidates only.
Qualification
10–20 suppliers assessed requirement by requirement.
Shortlist
Ranked, explainable, ready for your sourcing event.
Depth where it matters — instead of a stale database everywhere.
Search shows similarity. Evidence proves qualification.
Traditional databases answer “who do we already know?”. SpiderNet answers a different question: who can actually deliver this specific scope — and what evidence supports it?
| Directory model | SpiderNet |
|---|---|
| The database answers: which suppliers do we know? | SpiderNet answers: who satisfies this specific SOW? |
| Self-reported profiles | Evidence from real tenders, contracts and deliveries |
| One opaque match percentage | Requirement-by-requirement status with sources and gaps |
| A category search when the buyer remembers | Automatic extraction the moment the SOW arrives |
Any search can find similar profiles; only evidence finds qualified ones.
Built for buying teams; open to suppliers
Each role gets its own outcome: the research grunt work goes to the machine, the decision stays with the human.
Procurement specialists
Upload the SOW, confirm the requirements, approve the shortlist — hours instead of weeks of manual research.
Category managers
Taxonomy, qualification templates and scoring weights in your hands — with a full market view of your category.
Vendor management
A living Golden Record: duplicates merged, provenance on every attribute, contradictions surfaced.
Suppliers
One claimed profile and reusable qualification documents — visible to every buyer on the platform.
Buyers subscribe; suppliers join free
Network completeness is the point, so supplier participation is free. And ranking and qualification results are never for sale — to anyone.
Supplier — Free
Coverage. Make the network complete and correct.
- ✓A profile pre-built from tender history — claim it
- ✓Capabilities, certificates and project references
- ✓A correction and dispute channel for your data
- ✓Qualification documents uploaded once, valid with every buyer
- ✓Position based on evidence only — no paid boosts exist
Buyer — Pilot
Proof. On your own SOWs, against your own metrics.
- ✓Two categories, your real procurement cases
- ✓A three-month pilot across at least 15 real cases
- ✓Validated against a golden set built from your historical cases
- ✓Measurable targets: extraction accuracy, coverage, acceptance rate
- ✓No integration needed to start — runs alongside your current process
Buyer — Platform
Scale. Every category, the whole team.
- ✓Annual subscription per organization (tenant)
- ✓Unlimited sourcing cases in enabled categories
- ✓ERP and e-procurement integrations
- ✓Tenant-private data, shared supplier intelligence
- ✓Configurable taxonomy, rules and weights
Shared intelligence; private data; provenance on everything
On a multi-tenant platform the boundaries are strict: the supplier layer is shared, your commercial information is yours alone.
Shared supplier layer
Company identity, capabilities, certificates and public tender outcomes — one profile for every buyer. Claimable and correctable.
Tenant-private data
Your contracts, prices, evaluations and decisions never leave your tenant.
Provenance on every attribute
Every fact has a source, a date and a status. An AI inference is never presented as a verified fact.
Validate on your own cases, against your own metrics
The pilot runs in two categories on your real SOWs and is measured on a golden set built from your historical cases: extraction accuracy, recall of known-good suppliers, net-new candidates and acceptance rate. Targets are agreed up front — so the verdict leaves no room for argument.
An evidence-backed shortlist your buyers accept — in half the hours of the current process.
Where the name comes from
A spider does not patrol its web looking for something to happen. It sits still and reads the strands — one disturbance, and it knows exactly where in the structure the event occurred and what to do about it. A new SOW is that disturbance. SpiderNet is the web: every supplier a node, every tender a strand, and every piece of evidence a direction that carries the signal to exactly the right place.
Start with your own SOWs
Send us two or three recent Statements of Work and we will come back with the extracted requirements, the evidence-backed supplier shortlist behind them and a pilot scope.
- ✓No integration needed to start — uploading the document is enough.
- ✓No mandatory criterion excludes anyone until you confirm it.
- ✓Success is measured on your own baseline: hours, coverage, acceptance rate.